The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Corgi Vat Saver
bk


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 171
Date:
Corgi Vat Saver


Hi

I've had a client ask me about using the Corgi Vat Saver, which basically splits jobs down into component prices and charges VAT amounts accordingly. ie energy efficient items at 5% and the rest at 20%. They charge a fee of 25% of the VAT saved for using the software. I rang HMRC regarding this, as I didn't think this was allowed and they assured me that they do not support the scheme. However, I've just had a call from the Corgi Vat Saver manager, telling me that they have never had a customer who has had to repay any VAT and that they have a department that deal with any disputes with the VAT man. Apparently they have been running for 8 years and have over 3000 customers.

I have informed my client that HMRC do not support the system and therefore if he goes ahead and he has a VAT inspection he could be liable for a heafty VAT bill.

Just wondering if anyone has come across this and can offer some advice.

 

Many thanks

Debbie



__________________

Debbie Brown-Kane

Oakmanor Accountancy

www.oakmanoraccountancy.com

e: debbie@oakmanoraccountancy.com



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 292
Date:

Debbie
the First Tier Tribunal have recently heard a case using just this sort of system. You can read the decision here: www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2013/TC02895.html
Essentially, the Tribunal held that it was artificial for a plumber to split his supply in this way.
I suggest that any plumber continuing to use this system is leaving himself vulnerable to HMRC action.
You can PM me to discuss if that would be helpful.

__________________
bk


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 171
Date:

Hi Les

Many thanks, you have confirmed what I thought. They tried to tell me that it is not illegal, and although it is not, the VAT liability and responsibility lies with the company and not with Corgi Vat Saver. I don't think my client will go ahead as he is very sensible, but I think a few of his friends may have to rethink their involvement.

 



__________________

Debbie Brown-Kane

Oakmanor Accountancy

www.oakmanoraccountancy.com

e: debbie@oakmanoraccountancy.com



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 292
Date:

Pleased to have been of help.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About